Label themselves as “the theory of binary gender bisexual” (” bi non – binary person “) of McLeish wrote, he often asked what’s the difference between a bisexual and extensive bisexual – “not only perplex the outsiders have such doubt, even define themselves as bisexual or generic bisexual versa”. Some people think that bisexuality is equal to “like men and like women (” you like boys and girls”) “, McLeish pointed out that this definition is not comprehensive, because for many people, bisexual, in fact, his/her behalf “both like gay, also like other gender (” attracted to the same and other genders”) for example, if the bisexual women, for it is said she likes women, in addition may also like, bisexual men (intersex), and/or without gender person (such as agender/genderless). In other words, “same-sex and other genders (but not all gender)” is what this sexual orientation is called “bisexual”.
As for the difference between generality and bisexuality, the word “generic” stands for “all”; That is to say that a generic lover may be attracted to a person of “all” gender, regardless of whether he or she is a binary gender (male/female). Contrary to popular belief, however, this does not necessarily mean that the generalist is “gender-blind or gender-blind” or focused on “hearts, not parts”. Many people resent the concept of gender blindness because it makes them feel that an important part of their identity is being ignored. There are also people who interpret a pan-sex lover as someone who likes “men, women, and transgender people,” but it’s not appropriate to exclude transgender people from men/women.
Finally, the author mentioned, that we shall not be obliged to think if preferences bisexual and pansexual one of them is no respect for a different sexual orientation, don’t assume that all people in the use of the word with negative connotations – “not all bisexuals don’t know anything about the dual gender, generic bisexual is not each a” gender blindness “.” We are free to choose the right words to express our sexual orientation, as long as we do not choose a specific word to describe ourselves as the premise of being superior in bisexual playground.
Inside the LGBT groups, bisexual is probably the most by the indifference of a treat, because of the world’s people think they are “who can love”, so the bisexual will have many misunderstandings, even have a homosexual or heterosexual will say to them to decide “stop”, or is forced bisexual answered which side they think sex is better.
Human polyamory relationships should not have a certain pattern, and if they do, it is only important that they do not harm others. If you must let me further illustrate between “normal mode”, that I can only say: everyone needs, everyone can feel the good way, is the normal way, also has the most powerful reason to choose the mode.
What is the purpose of sex? It is the only joy, not the reproduction, so happiness is the first. So we say that everything that can bring physical pleasure, or even orgasm, is the most reasonable and should be desired and should not be rejected. By this reasoning, bisexuality should be a rational choice for human beings. Since having sex with both men and women can bring us happiness, why should we refuse one of them? This kind of happiness is with all the people, is the nature gives us, is the most accord with the nature nature, rejected either one of them, is to reject a part of nature attribute.
Even people who open relationship cannot deny the rationality of bisexuality. There are many different men and women, from the land of men feel masculinity, from women feel feminine beauty, fall in love with a man and a woman at the same time, is not the most normal? Isn’t it possible to provide a complementary possibility?
Comments
Post a Comment